翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Miller Township, Hand County, South Dakota
・ Miller Township, Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania
・ Miller Township, Knox County, Nebraska
・ Miller Township, Knox County, Ohio
・ Miller Township, LaSalle County, Illinois
・ Miller Township, Pennsylvania
・ Miller Township, Perry County, Pennsylvania
・ Miller Transit
・ Miller Trunk Corridor
・ Miller twist rule
・ Miller v Jackson
・ Miller v Janks
・ Miller v Miller
・ Miller v R
・ Miller v. Alabama
Miller v. Albright
・ Miller v. Arizona Corporation Commission
・ Miller v. California
・ Miller v. Campbell
・ Miller v. Commissioner
・ Miller v. Davis
・ Miller v. Jenkins
・ Miller v. Johnson
・ Miller v. Korns
・ Miller v. National Broadcasting Co.
・ Miller v. Schoene
・ Miller v. Skumanick
・ Miller v. United States
・ Miller v. Universal City Studios, Inc.
・ Miller Valley


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Miller v. Albright : ウィキペディア英語版
Miller v. Albright

''Miller v. Albright'', , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the validity of laws relating to U.S. citizenship at birth for children born outside the United States, out of wedlock, to an American parent. The Court declined to overturn a more restrictive citizenship requirement applying to an illegitimate foreign-born child of an American father, as opposed to a child born to an American mother under similar circumstances.
Lorelyn Miller was born in the Philippines to an American father and a Philippine mother (who were not married). She later applied for a U.S. passport, but was turned down on the grounds that she was not a U.S. citizen. Miller challenged the law under which she had been denied citizenship, claiming that the law was unconstitutionally discriminatory because it imposed stricter requirements for a foreign-born illegitimate child of an American father than would have applied if her American parent had been her mother.
Six of the nine justices of the Supreme Court rejected Miller's challenge to the law, in three separate opinions that denied her citizenship claim for different reasons. Three justices dissented, agreeing with Miller that the law in question was impermissibly discriminatory and should have been struck down.
A subsequent case, ''Nguyen v. I.N.S.'', , held by a 5–4 majority that the law at issue in the ''Miller'' case was acceptable.
==References==


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Miller v. Albright」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.